![]()
For OneTouch, OneTouch 2, OneTouch 3, and OneTouch 3 mini drives, you may use the OneTouch Manager to erase the drive.For OneTouch 4 drives, you may use the Maxtor Manager to erase the drive. #CRYSTALDISKINFO REALLOCATED SECTORS COUNT ST3000 SOFTWARE#For external drives: Use DiscWizard or your external drive management software to zero-fill your external drive.For SCSI drives: Use Seatools Enterprise (for Seagate drives) to perform a low-level format on the drive.This option will erase ALL data on the partitions on the drive.įor more information on performing a zero-fill, please see Document ID: 203931. #CRYSTALDISKINFO REALLOCATED SECTORS COUNT ST3000 FULL#For internal ATA/IDE and SATA drives: Use SeaTools for DOS to perform a full zero fill.For Seagate SCSI drives, use Seatools Enterprise. Use SeaTools diagnostics for Seagate and Maxtor drives and run a long test.View Windows help on detecting and repairing disk errors for more information. In the Check Disk dialog box, select the Automatically Fix File System Errors check box, select the Scan For And Attempt Recovery Of Bad Sectors check box, and then click Start.Click Check Now in the Error-Checking Status area.On the shortcut menu, click Properties, and on the Tools tab in the Properties dialog box.Double Click (My) Computer, and right-click the hard disk.Use the Error Checking utility built in to Microsoft Windows.There are several methods for finding and correcting bad sectors. However, any information written to a bad sector is usually lost. I also believe to test such drives it must be done from a DOS environment not Windows to prevent skewed results.Explains several methods for finding and correcting bad sectors.īad sectors can often be corrected by using a spare sector built into the drive. TLDR: In my own experience bench testing the FireCuda drive delivers mixed results, Windows performance is extremely fast & solid, nor do I put much stock in third party application's to verify the drives condition. Little simplistic as personally I believe the algorithm is more far complex reacting to usage and demand placed on the drive in real-time. #CRYSTALDISKINFO REALLOCATED SECTORS COUNT ST3000 MP4#This capture below of a 13Gb MP4 file transfer best illustrates how the FireCuda drives operate, first utilising the 8Gb NAND Flash at GB/s transfer speeds until the NAND is partially full, then transferring at normal HDD speeds. A 4Gb BIN file copies from the M.2 NVMe SSD to the FireCuda in literally a of couple seconds. In normal usage the drive is very fast (for HDD) and stable, leaving no questions or concerns regarding it's performance, with such variances being invisible to the user. ![]() ![]() Same drive, same benchmark, big difference in write speed, again this is very likely the work of the NAND Flash algorithm. My 1TB version tops out at around 140 MB/s for reads and 130 MB/s for writes (HDD not NAND). With the FireCuda drives R&W will vary due to the NAND Flash algorithm. I have also seen the FireCuda drive confuse some benchmarking software, presenting itself as a RAM drive or deliver poor test results, which again I put down to the NAND Flash algorithm as it's observably fast in normal usage. My other notebook (Asus GL703GS) has a Seagate FireCuda 1TB drive initially it tested slow with CrystalDiskMark 6, today it tests at 141 MB/s, this I attribute to the NAND Flash algorithm not any physical issue with the drive. Nor is it unusual for a HDD to reallocate some sectors with values not always being straightforward to interpret. #CRYSTALDISKINFO REALLOCATED SECTORS COUNT ST3000 PLUS#Personally I'd test the drive with Seagate's own software not a third party application, as the interpretation of the SMART data can vary, plus the Firecuda drives also have 8Gb of NAND Flash for acceleration which may confuse the matter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |